Status
Planned. No test has been run and no result is reported. The page describes the proposed method.
The question
Can an agent identify missing connections between related pages and propose links that a reviewer considers useful for the reader?
The goal is not to maximize the number of links. It is to improve navigation between pages with a meaningful relationship.
The proposed scope
Select a defined section and inventory its pages. Keep a record of the existing internal links before any changes.
The agent should propose a short list of additions, with the source sentence, destination, anchor text, and reason for each link. It should flag broken destinations separately from editorial opportunities.
The review
A reviewer checks whether the destination answers a relevant next question, whether the anchor text accurately describes it, and whether the link fits naturally in the page.
Repeated destinations, keyword-heavy anchors, and unrelated pages should be rejected rather than counted as successful output.
Validation and measurement
Before publication, validate every destination and inspect the rendered pages. Record the approved revision and any other changes made during the observation period.
Operational measures include accepted proposals, rejected proposals, and required repairs. Any later search or navigation outcome needs an agreed baseline and cannot be attributed to the links simply because it happened afterward.
Reporting
The result should include the accepted and rejected examples, the reasoning, and the limits of the evidence. Until that exists, this remains a test plan.
Explore the internal-linking workflow or read the audit model.